What Is A Voluntary Restraint Agreement Definition

A typical WORM limits the supply of exports by product type, country and volume. GATT articles dealing with trade-type government measures prohibit export restrictions under normal circumstances; where permitted, they shall be non-discriminatory and shall be enforced only through duties, taxes and fees. However, the participation of governments in REVs is not always clear. In addition, VER do not always have fixed market-sharing provisions; they may be available, for example, in the form of an export forecast and thus become cautious. For these reasons, REVs fall into a « grey zone », as there may be doubts as to their illegality under the GATT. In addition, parties to an ERR are unlikely to seek a ruling under GATT dispute settlement procedures – they have never done so before – while third parties can often benefit from an ERR and are therefore reluctant to initiate dispute settlement proceedings. Finally, the signatories of the Subsidies and Countervailing Duties Code, resulting from the Tokyo Round trade negotiations, appear to have acquired legal powers to negotiate THE REVs. In this regard, the decision of the GATT Council of Representatives in 1987 to establish a panel to examine the Japan-US semiconductor agreement is important. An ERR is a measure where the government or industry of the importing country agrees with the competing government or industry of the exporting country to limit the volume of exports of one or more products by the exporting country.

According to this definition, the term VER is a general reference for all bilaterally agreed export restriction measures. Strictly speaking, however, an ERVs are a measure taken and administered unilaterally by the exporting country and is « voluntary » in the sense that the country has the formal right to eliminate or modify it. Typically, an WORM occurs due to pressure from an importing country; it can then be considered « voluntary » only in the sense that the exporting country may prefer it to other barriers to trade that the importing country might use. In addition, in an uncompetitive, particularly oligopolistic industrial export company, it could be to their advantage to negotiate an ERVs that are then truly « voluntary ». The answer to this question depends on whether an ERN fulfils its objective of securing jobs and promoting adaptation in the protected sector and, if so, at what cost. These objectives may not be compatible. Modernization to regain competitiveness often involves a shift to a more capital-intensive mode of production. REVs are usually implemented when exporting from one country to another. VER have been used since at least the 1930s and have been applied to products ranging from textiles and footwear to steel, machine tools and automobiles. They became a popular form of protection in the 1980s; they have not violated the agreements concluded by countries under the current General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

Following the GATT Uruguay Round, concluded in 1994, Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreed not to introduce new REOs and to allow existing ones to expire over a period of four years, with exemptions for one sector in each importing country. The above figures do not include the Multifibre Arrangement (MFA) which, together with its predecessor, the Long-Term Arrangement on Cotton Textiles (1962-72), was the model for VER. The MFA is a multilaterally negotiated deviation from GATT based on the principle that developed countries, which are the main importers of textiles, need special protection against « market disturbances » caused by cheaper exports, usually from developing countries. .

Non classé