(b) clear guidelines for prosecuting offences committed by a member of the United States Armed Forces during their fame; (1) The agreement will provide the legal mechanism for promoting defence cooperation between the Philippines and the United States, thereby enhancing the tactical, strategic and technological capabilities of our armed forces; The agreement contains various procedural safeguards to protect due process rights and prohibit dual threats.  [VIII 2-6] The agreement also exempts Filipino personnel from visa formalities and ensures expedited entry and exit;  [IV] requires the United States to accept Philippine driver`s licenses;  [V] authorizes Philippine personnel to carry weapons to U.S. military facilities during deployment;  [VI] provides for exemptions and import/export duties for Filipino personnel;  [X, XI] requires the United States to provide medical care to Filipino personnel;  [XIV] and exempts Philippine vehicles, ships and aircraft from landing or port charges, shipping or overflight charges, road tolls or any other charge for the use of U.S. military installations.  [XV] (c) specific directive on the importation and export by the United States Government of equipment, materials, supplies and other goods that have been imported or acquired in the Philippines by or on behalf of the United States Armed Forces in the course of activities covered by the agreement; and the United States could also use this moment to try to renegotiate a new and better deal with the Philippines – one that meets President Duterte`s goal of being strong against the United States and the other that gives President Trump the opportunity to mark another important agreement, this time a defense deal, of his unique footprint, that could advance U.S. interests for years. On February 11, 2020, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte officially announced at the U.S. Embassy in Manila that he was coming to an end to the pact, with the denunciation expected to come into force in 180 days, unless otherwise agreed during that period. In the past, Duterte has shown admiration for both Russian forces and the People`s Liberation Army of China, although the Philippines and China are involved in a dispute in the South China Sea over sovereignty over the Spratly Islands.  In June 2020, the Philippine government reversed this decision and announced that it was maintaining the agreement.  Whether the President can unilaterally denounce a treaty or agreement with other countries has yet to be decided by the Supreme Court.
(See Pimentel`s argument that Duterte could unilaterally remove the context of VFA needs) The VFA has been the subject of several audits since its ratification.